G.R. No. 123456
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JUAN DELA CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.

Ponente: J. Reyes

FACTS

Accused-appellant Juan Dela Cruz was charged with the crime of Robbery with Homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on January 15, 2018, Dela Cruz, armed with a knife, entered the residence of the victim, Pedro Santos, with intent to rob. During the commission of the robbery, Santos resisted, and Dela Cruz stabbed him, causing his death. The prosecution presented eyewitness testimony from Maria Santos, the victim’s wife, who positively identified Dela Cruz as the perpetrator. The defense, on the other hand, interposed the defense of alibi, claiming that Dela Cruz was in a different city at the time of the incident.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Dela Cruz guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision in toto. Hence, this appeal before the Supreme Court.

—

ISSUES

1. Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
2. Whether the defense of alibi can prevail over positive identification.
3. Whether the qualifying circumstance of homicide was properly appreciated.

RULING

1. The prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court held that the prosecution successfully established all the elements of Robbery with Homicide: (a) the taking of personal property with intent to gain; (b) the taking was with violence or intimidation against persons; and (c) on the occasion of the robbery, homicide was committed.

The Court gave credence to the testimony of eyewitness Maria Santos, who consistently and categorically identified Dela Cruz as the assailant. Her testimony was clear, straightforward, and unwavering even during cross-examination. The Court emphasized that positive identification, when credible and categorical, prevails over alibi and denial.

2. The defense of alibi cannot prevail over positive identification.

The defense of alibi is inherently weak and must be supported by clear and convincing evidence that the accused was so far away that it was physically impossible for him to be at the scene of the crime. Dela Cruz failed to prove this physical impossibility. Moreover, alibi becomes even less credible in the face of positive identification by a credible witness who had no ill motive to falsely testify.

3. The qualifying circumstance of homicide was properly appreciated.

The killing occurred on the occasion of the robbery, as the evidence showed that the homicide was directly linked to the felonious taking. The intent to rob was evident from the stolen items, and the killing was perpetrated to facilitate the robbery or to eliminate resistance. Thus, the complex crime of Robbery with Homicide was correctly applied.

—

DISPOSITIVE PORTION

WHEREFORE, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Regional Trial Court’s conviction of accused-appellant Juan Dela Cruz for the crime of Robbery with Homicide and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua is AFFIRMED in toto.

Costs against accused-appellant.

SO ORDERED.