GR 171766; (July, 2010) (Digest)
G.R. No. 171766 ; July 29, 2010
ASIAWORLD PROPERTIES PHILIPPINE CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
FACTS
Petitioner Asiaworld Properties Philippine Corporation, a real estate developer, filed its 2001 Annual Income Tax Return declaring a minimum corporate income tax due but with a claimed overpayment of β±6,473,959.00. This overpayment computation included a “Prior Yearβs Excess Credit” of β±7,468,061.00, which was net of a 1999 excess creditable withholding tax of β±18,477,144.00 that petitioner sought to refund. In its 1999 ITR, petitioner had already chosen the option to carry over its excess tax credits to the succeeding taxable years.
On April 9, 2002, petitioner filed a claim for refund of β±18,477,144.00 for its 2001 excess creditable taxes. To toll the prescriptive period, it subsequently filed a Petition for Review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) on April 12, 2002. The CTA denied the petition, ruling that by opting to carry over the 1999 excess credits, petitioner was precluded from later claiming a refund for the same amount. The Court of Appeals affirmed this decision.
ISSUE
Whether a corporate taxpayer, having exercised the option to carry over excess income tax credits to succeeding taxable years, is subsequently prohibited from claiming a refund for the unused portion of those carried-over credits in a later taxable year.
RULING
The Supreme Court denied the petition and affirmed the lower courts’ decisions. The resolution hinges on the interpretation of Section 76 of the National Internal Revenue Code (NIRC) of 1997. This provision states that a corporation with excess quarterly income tax payments may either carry over the excess to the succeeding taxable years or claim a refund or tax credit. Crucially, the law mandates that “once the option to carry-over and apply the excess quarterly income tax… has been made, such option shall be considered irrevocable for that taxable period.”
The Court clarified that the irrevocability rule applies to the specific taxable period in which the option was made. Petitioner irrevocably chose to carry over its 1999 excess credits. Consequently, it could no longer convert that same 1999 excess into a cash refund in any subsequent year. The carry-over obligation persists until the entire excess amount is fully utilized against tax liabilities in the succeeding years. Petitionerβs attempt to claim a refund for the unused portion of its 1999 credits in 2001 constituted a belated shift from its irrevocable 1999 election, which the law does not permit. The claim was therefore properly denied.
