GR 157594; (March, 2010) (Digest)
G.R. No. 157594 March 9, 2010
TOSHIBA INFORMATION EQUIPMENT (PHILS.), INC., Petitioner, vs. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
FACTS
Petitioner Toshiba Information Equipment (Phils.), Inc. (Toshiba) is a domestic corporation registered with the Philippine Economic Zone Authority (PEZA) as an ECOZONE export enterprise and with the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) as a VAT taxpayer. For the first and second quarters of 1997, Toshiba filed VAT returns declaring input VAT payments on domestic purchases totaling ₱3,875,139.65 and later amended them to report zero-rated export sales. On March 30, 1999, Toshiba filed applications for tax credit/refund of its unutilized input VAT with the DOF One-Stop Shop. The next day, it filed a Petition for Review with the Court of Tax Appeals (CTA) to toll the two-year prescriptive period, seeking a refund or tax credit certificate for the said amount. The CIR opposed the claim. The parties submitted a Joint Stipulation of Facts and Issues, agreeing that Toshiba was a VAT-registered entity subject to zero percent VAT on its export sales and that the petition was filed within the prescriptive period. The CTA, after trial, granted Toshiba’s claim but reduced the refundable amount to ₱1,385,282.08 after disallowing some input taxes for lack of proper substantiation. Both parties filed motions for reconsideration. The CIR, for the first time in his motion, argued that Toshiba, as a PEZA-registered enterprise, was tax-exempt under Section 24 of Republic Act No. 7916 and thus not entitled to any input VAT credit/refund. The CTA denied both motions. The CIR appealed to the Court of Appeals, which reversed the CTA, holding that Toshiba was a tax-exempt entity under a special law and its export sales were VAT-exempt transactions, making it ineligible for an input VAT refund. The Court of Appeals denied Toshiba’s motion for reconsideration.
ISSUE
Whether Toshiba, a PEZA-registered ECOZONE export enterprise, is entitled to a refund or credit of input VAT paid on its domestic purchases of goods and services attributable to its zero-rated export sales.
RULING
No. The Supreme Court denied the petition and affirmed the Decision of the Court of Appeals. The Court ruled that Toshiba, as a PEZA-registered enterprise, is exempt from all internal revenue taxes, including VAT, pursuant to Section 24 of Republic Act No. 7916 (The Special Economic Zone Act of 1995). This exemption is reiterated in Section 103(q) of the 1977 Tax Code, as amended, which exempts transactions exempt under special laws. Since Toshiba is exempt from VAT, its export sales are not zero-rated but VAT-exempt transactions. Following Section 4.103-1 of Revenue Regulations No. 7-95, a VAT-exempt seller is not allowed any tax credit on input VAT previously paid. Consequently, Toshiba is not entitled to a refund or credit of input VAT. The Court further held that the principle of granting input VAT refunds to zero-rated taxpayers cannot be extended to tax-exempt entities, as the two are distinct concepts. The Court also noted that the CIR properly raised the issue of tax exemption for the first time on appeal, as it involved a pure question of law.
