The Rule on Fixed Term vs. At the Pleasure of the Appointer

🔍

↵

SUBJECT: The Rule on Fixed Term vs. At the Pleasure of the Appointer

I. Statement of the Issue: Whether a public officer holds office for a fixed term, providing security of tenure, or serves at the pleasure of the appointing authority, subject to removal without cause.
II. Brief Answer: The nature of the appointmentwhether for a fixed term or at pleasureis determined by the law, statute, or constitutional provision creating the office. A fixed-term appointment confers a property right to the office for the duration of the term, protected by constitutional due process. An appointment at pleasure grants no such vested right, and the officer may be removed at the discretion of the appointing authority, subject only to possible statutory or constitutional constraints on the grounds for removal.
III. Applicable Laws and Doctrines:
A. The 1987 Constitution, Article IX-B, Section 4(2): “No officer or employee of the civil service shall be removed or suspended except for cause provided by law.”
B. The Administrative Code of 1987 (Executive Order No. 292): Book V, Title I, Subtitle A, Chapter 5, Section 46, et seq., on disciplinary actions.
C. Doctrine of Security of Tenure: A guarantee that employees shall not be removed from their positions except for a valid cause and through procedural due process.
D. Distinction between Presidential Appointees and Career Service Officers: Presidential appointees, primarily under the non-career service, are often considered at the pleasure of the President, unless the law specifies a fixed term. Career service officers enjoy security of tenure.
E. Jurisprudence: CSC v. Darangina (G.R. No. 167472, 2007) and De la Llana v. Alba (G.R. No. 57883, 1982) elucidate the nature of appointments.
IV. Nature of a Fixed-Term Appointment: An appointment for a fixed, definite period (e.g., 3, 5, or 7 years) as expressly provided by law, charter, or statute. The officer acquires a legal, enforceable right to the office until the expiration of the term, absent a valid cause for removal. Removal before the term’s end constitutes an illegal dismissal if not for cause and with due process. The fixed term itself is the essence of the security of tenure for that position.
V. Nature of an Appointment “At Pleasure”: An appointment where the tenure is held at the discretion of the appointing authority and is generally coterminous with the appointing authority’s tenure or subject to their will. The officer holds office only for as long as the appointor desires. Removal can be with or without cause, unless a specific law requires cause. This is common for non-career, confidential, or policy-determining positions where trust and confidence are paramount.
VI. Determining the Nature of the Appointment: The controlling factor is the law that created the office. If the statute is silent, the nature of the functions (confidential, policy-influencing) may indicate it is at pleasure. A fixed term must be explicitly stated. The wording of the appointment paper is not conclusive; it is the substantive law that governs.
VII. Key Jurisprudential Tests:
A. The “Unless Sooner Removed for Cause” Proviso: If a law states a fixed term “unless sooner removed for cause,” it reinforces the fixed-term nature and mandates that removal prior to term expiration can only be for cause.
B. The “Holdover” Doctrine: For fixed-term officers, the right to hold over after term expiration is not absolute and depends on statutory intent. Holdover is not a vested right but a permissive one to prevent a hiatus in office.
C. Presidential Appointees: As a general rule, presidential appointees who are not members of the Career Executive Service (CES) or the career service serve at the pleasure of the President. However, if Congress, in creating an office, prescribes a fixed term, the President’s power of removal is limited to causes specified by law during that term.
VIII. Procedural Implications:
A. Fixed-Term Appointee: Removal requires formal administrative proceedings under the Civil Service Law (E.O. 292, Sec. 46-47), with notice, hearing, and decision based on substantial evidence. The burden of proof for cause lies with the government.
B. Appointee at Pleasure: Removal is generally an executive prerogative. While a formal hearing may not be required, fundamental fairness and, in some cases, statutory requirements may dictate notice and an opportunity to be heard, especially if a stigma is attached to the dismissal.
IX. Practical Remedies:

For the Appointee Claiming Illegal Removal from a Fixed Term: File a formal appeal with the Civil Service Commission (CSC) within 15 days from receipt of the removal order, pursuant to CSC rules. Simultaneously, or if the CSC appeal is denied, file a Petition for Certiorari, Prohibition, and/or Mandamus with the Regional Trial Court (exercising jurisdiction over the government agency) or directly with the Court of Appeals, arguing grave abuse of discretion and violation of security of tenure. Seek reinstatement and payment of backwages and benefits.

For the Appointee at Pleasure: Challenge removal only on grounds of bad faith, denial of due process where required by law, or if the removal was based on constitutionally protected grounds (e.g., political belief). A Petition for Certiorari may lie if there is a clear showing of grave abuse of discretion amounting to lack or excess of jurisdiction. The remedy, however, is often limited to clearing one’s name; reinstatement is rarely granted unless a specific statutory violation is proven.

Preventive Measures for Fixed-Term Appointees: Upon appointment, secure and preserve the official appointment paper and the original statute or executive order creating the office and specifying the term. At the first hint of removal without cause, formally invoke in writing the specific legal provision granting the fixed term and the constitutional right to security of tenure, addressed to the appointing authority and the CSC.

For the Appointing Authority Removing a Fixed-Term Appointee: Ensure a thorough investigation and the existence of a valid cause as defined by law (e.g., dishonesty, neglect of duty, misconduct). Meticulously follow procedural due processissue a formal charge, allow answer, conduct a formal hearing if requested, and render a decision based on evidence. For an appointee at pleasure, a written notice of termination stating the discretionary nature of the appointment is sufficient, but prudence dictates providing a brief, non-stigmatizing reason to preempt allegations of bad faith.

General Advisory: In borderline cases, seek a Declaratory Relief action from the courts to determine the nature of the office before a removal controversy arises. This provides clarity and prevents protracted litigation.