The Difference between ‘Cashier’s Check’ and ‘Certified Check’
| SUBJECT: The Difference between ‘Cashier’s Check’ and ‘Certified Check’ |
I. Introduction
This memorandum provides an exhaustive analysis of the distinction between a cashier’s check and a certified check under Philippine mercantile law. Both instruments are widely used in significant transactions due to their perceived security and reliability compared to personal checks. However, their legal nature, the parties involved, the moment of certification, and the resulting obligations differ substantially. This research will delineate these differences by examining the relevant provisions of the Negotiable Instruments Law ( Act No. 2031 , hereafter “NIL”), pertinent jurisprudence, and accepted banking practices, culminating in a comparative analysis to guide their proper use.
II. Legal Framework and Governing Law
The primary statute governing both cashier’s checks and certified checks is the Negotiable Instruments Law. While the NIL does not explicitly define these specific instruments, their legal character is derived from its general provisions on checks and the doctrine of acceptance or certification. Key provisions include Section 185 (Definition of a Check), Section 62 (Liability of Drawer), and most critically, Section 187 (Certification of a Check). The latter provides: “Where a check is certified by the bank on which it is drawn, the certification is equivalent to an acceptance.” The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) regulations and the General Banking Law also provide the operational context for their issuance.
III. Definition and Nature of a Cashier’s Check
A cashier’s check is a check drawn by a bank upon itself. It is an order issued by the bank’s authorized officer (e.g., the cashier) directing the same bank to pay a specified sum to the payee or to the order of the payee. The bank is both the drawer and the drawee. Upon issuance, the bank immediately debits the amount from the account of the purchaser (the remitter) and holds the funds in its own liability account. Consequently, the cashier’s check represents a direct, primary, and unconditional obligation of the issuing bank. It is considered a bank’s own check and is treated as the equivalent of cash in many commercial transactions due to the high degree of certainty of payment.
IV. Definition and Nature of a Certified Check
A certified check is a personal check drawn by a depositor on his or her own account, which the drawee bank has certified. Certification is the act whereby the bank, upon the request of the holder or the drawer, writes, stamps, or attaches a notation on the check signifying that: (a) the signature of the drawer is genuine, (b) the drawer has sufficient funds in the account to cover the check, and (c) the bank sets aside and earmarks those funds for the payment of that specific check. Under Section 187 of the NIL, this certification is equivalent to an acceptance, making the bank primarily liable on the instrument. The original drawer and indorsers are discharged from liability to the holder who procures the certification, unless otherwise agreed.
V. Parties and Their Liabilities
For a cashier’s check, the primary parties are: the issuing bank (as drawer-drawee), the payee, and the remitter (purchaser). The bank has an absolute and primary obligation to pay the instrument. The remitter is not a party to the check itself and generally has no liability on the instrument, though he may have a cause of action against the bank for improper dishonor.
For a certified check, the primary parties are: the original depositor (as drawer), the drawee bank (as acceptor), and the payee. Upon certification, the bank becomes the acceptor and assumes primary liability. The drawer is secondarily liable unless discharged by the certification (per Section 188, NIL). Subsequent indorsers may also be discharged depending on who procured the certification.
VI. The Act and Moment of Certification
This is a critical distinction. For a cashier’s check, the “certification” is inherent and simultaneous with its issuance. The bank creates the instrument as its own direct obligation from the outset. The check is issued already in its certified form.
For a certified check, certification is a separate and subsequent act performed on a pre-existing personal check. It occurs after the drawer has issued the check to the payee. The certification can be procured by the holder (which discharges the drawer and indorsers) or by the drawer (which does not discharge the drawer, per Section 188, NIL). The funds are earmarked at the moment of certification.
VII. Comparative Analysis Table
| Aspect of Difference | Cashier’s Check | Certified Check |
|---|---|---|
| Drawer | The bank itself. | The depositor/account holder. |
| Drawee/Acceptor | The same issuing bank. | The bank where the drawer has an account. |
| Origination | Created ab initio as a bank’s obligation. | Begins as a personal check, later certified. |
| Primary Obligor | The issuing bank, from the moment of issuance. | The certifying bank, from the moment of certification. |
| Funds Status | Purchaser’s account is debited immediately; funds become bank’s liability. | Sufficient funds are earmarked in the drawer’s account but not immediately debited. |
| Discharge of Drawer | The drawer (the bank) cannot be discharged from its own primary obligation. | Drawer is discharged if certification is procured by the holder (Sec. 188, NIL). |
| Common Procurement | Requested by and paid for by the remitter (purchaser). | Requested by either the holder or the drawer of a personal check. |
| Perceived Risk | Generally lower; direct bank obligation. | Slightly higher; relies on initial validity of drawer’s check and bank’s solvency at payment date. |
| Stop Payment | Generally not allowed, as it is the bank’s own note. | May be possible under very limited circumstances before delivery to holder, but extremely difficult post-certification. |
VIII. Treatment on Dishonor and Stop-Payment Orders
A cashier’s check is deemed the bank’s own promissory note. As such, the issuing bank cannot ordinarily issue a stop-payment order against its own obligation without incurring liability. Dishonor of a cashier’s check for insufficient funds is a legal impossibility, as the bank’s credit backs it. Dishonor can only occur due to technicalities (e.g., material alteration, stale check) and exposes the bank to potential liability for damages.
For a certified check, the bank, as acceptor, is primarily liable. Jurisprudence suggests that a bank cannot refuse payment on a certified check after certification, even at the request of the drawer, as the funds are already earmarked. A stop-payment order is generally ineffective against a holder in due course of a certified check. Dishonor would constitute a serious breach of the bank’s accepted obligation.
IX. Jurisprudential Highlights
The Supreme Court has consistently upheld the prime obligation of a bank on a cashier’s check. In Philippine Commercial International Bank v. Court of Appeals ( G.R. No. 121413 , January 29, 2001), the Court ruled that a cashier’s check is a primary obligation of the issuing bank and constitutes its written promise to pay upon demand.
Regarding certified checks, the Court in Bank of the Philippine Islands v. Court of Appeals ( G.R. No. 102383 , November 26, 1992) emphasized that certification signifies the bank’s absolute undertaking to pay the check, making it the equivalent of an acceptance under the NIL. The bank’s liability becomes paramount upon certification.
X. Conclusion and Practical Implications
In summary, while both a cashier’s check and a certified check serve as secure payment mechanisms backed by a bank’s credit, they are distinct instruments. A cashier’s check is a direct obligation of the issuing bank from its creation, purchased by a remitter. A certified check is a personal check transformed by the bank’s subsequent acceptance, with liability shifting primarily to the bank at that moment. The choice between them in practice may depend on factors such as who initiates the transaction (payer prefers a cashier’s check), the need for immediate drawer discharge (payee prefers to procure certification), or specific contractual requirements. Understanding these differences is crucial for ensuring the intended security and liability arrangements in any mercantile transaction.
