Thursday, March 26, 2026

The Concept of Mora Accipiendi

🔎 Search our Comprehensive Legal Repository…

I. Introduction
This memorandum addresses the concept of mora accipiendi or delay on the part of the obligee (creditor) in the performance of obligations under Philippine Civil Law. Rooted in Articles 1169 of the Civil Code, mora accipiendi occurs when the obligee unjustifiably fails to accept the performance tendered by the obligor (debtor) at the time it is due. Unlike mora solvendi (delay by the debtor), the effects of mora accipiendi primarily operate to benefit the obligor and mitigate their liability.
II. Legal Foundation
The primary legal foundation is Article 1169 of the Civil Code, which states: “Those obliged to deliver or to do something incur in delay from the time the obligee judicially or extrajudicially demands from them the fulfillment of their obligation. However, the demand by the creditor shall not be necessary in order that delay may exist: (1) When the obligation or the law expressly so declare; or (2) When from the nature and the circumstances of the obligation it appears that the designation of the time when the thing is to be delivered or the service is to be rendered was a controlling motive for the establishment of the contract; or (3) When demand would be useless, as when the obligor has rendered it beyond his power to perform. In reciprocal obligations, neither party incurs in delay if the other does not comply or is not ready to comply in a proper manner with what is incumbent upon him. From the moment one of the parties fulfills his obligation, delay by the other begins.”
III. Essential Elements
For mora accipiendi to exist, the following concurrent elements must be present:

IV. Distinction from Mora Solvendi
Mora accipiendi is delay by the creditor in acceptance; mora solvendi is delay by the debtor in performance. The consequences differ significantly:

V. Effects and Legal Consequences
Upon the occurrence of mora accipiendi:

VI. Proof of Tender and Demand
The burden of proving the existence of mora accipiendi rests upon the obligor. This requires clear evidence of:

Documentary evidence, witnesses, or formal notarial notices are critical. Without proof of a valid tender, mora accipiendi cannot be invoked.
VII. Exceptions and Special Considerations
Mora accipiendi does not apply:

VIII. Interaction with Consignation
Consignation (judicial deposit) under Articles 1256 to 1261 of the Civil Code is the logical and formal remedy following a creditor’s unjustified refusal to accept payment or delivery. A valid tender is a prerequisite for consignation. The filing of an action for consignation, with prior notice to the creditor, serves as conclusive proof of the debtor’s attempt to extinguish the obligation and places the creditor in mora accipiendi.
IX. Practical Remedies
For the obligor (debtor) facing a creditor in mora accipiendi, the following practical steps and remedies are available: (1) Formalize the Tender: Issue a notarial demand or a written notice specifying the exact performance offered, the time, and the place for acceptance, providing the creditor a final reasonable period to accept. (2) Initiate Consignation: If refusal persists, file a petition for consignation with the proper court. This action, once approved, discharges the obligation and entitles the obligor to recover costs. (3) Suspend Performance: In reciprocal obligations, the obligor may suspend their own performance without incurring delay (mora solvendi) until the creditor shows readiness to accept. (4) Assert Liability for Damages: The obligor may counterclaim for any damages suffered due to the creditor’s unjustified delay, such as storage costs, preservation expenses, or other incidental losses. (5) Seek Rescission: In appropriate cases, particularly in contracts for delivery of goods or property, the obligor may judicially seek rescission of the contract under Article 1191, with the right to recover damages. (6) Document Everything: Maintain meticulous records of all communications, proofs of tender, and evidence of refusal, as the burden of proof lies squarely with the obligor. Prudent practice dictates that the tender and subsequent steps be done with the assistance of counsel to ensure technical compliance with procedural requirements.

Hot this week

GR 223572; (November, 2020)

JENNIFER M. ENANO-BOTE, VIRGILIO A. BOTE, JAIME M. MATIBAG, WILFREDO L. PIMENTEL, TERESITA M. ENANO, PETITIONERS, VS. JOSE CH. ALVAREZ, CENTENNIAL AIR, INC. AND SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, RESPONDENTS

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the Word in GR L 2024

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the...

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in G.R. No. 272006

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in...

The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones)

SUBJECT: The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones) I. INTRODUCTION...

GR 249027; (April, 2024) (Digest)

G.R. No. 249027, April 3, 2024Narciso B. Guinto (Released...

The Concept of ‘The Property Registration Decree’ (PD 1529) and the ‘Torrens System’

SUBJECT: The Concept of 'The Property Registration Decree' (PD...

The Rule on ‘Retention Limits’ for Landowners (5 Hectares)

SUBJECT: The Rule on 'Retention Limits' for Landowners (5...

The Concept of ‘The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law’ (CARL – RA 6657)

SUBJECT: The Concept of 'The Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law'...

The Rule on ‘Homestead Patents’ and the 5-Year Prohibition on Alienation

SUBJECT: The Rule on 'Homestead Patents' and the 5-Year...

The Rule on ‘Privacy Safeguards for National ID Data’

SUBJECT: The Rule on 'Privacy Safeguards for National ID...

The Concept of ‘The Philippine Identification System Act’ (PhilSys – RA 11055)

SUBJECT: The Concept of 'The Philippine Identification System Act'...

The Rule on ‘BSP Guidelines on Cryptocurrency and Wallets’

SUBJECT: The Rule on 'BSP Guidelines on Cryptocurrency and...
spot_img

Related Articles

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img