The Concept of Forgery in Land Titles

🔍

↵

SUBJECT: The Concept of Forgery in Land Titles

I. Introduction and Legal Foundation
The Torrens system of land registration, established under Presidential Decree No. 1529 or the Property Registration Decree, aims to guarantee the indefeasibility and incontrovertibility of a registered title. However, this principle is not absolute. A title procured through forgery is void ab initio (from the beginning) and does not enjoy the protection of indefeasibility. Forgery constitutes a ground for the original registration to be nullified or for the title to be reconveyed, as it is a fatal defect that occurs at the very inception of the registration process.
II. Definition of Forgery under the Revised Penal Code
Forgery, as a crime, is defined under Articles 161 and 172 of the Revised Penal Code. In the context of land titles, it commonly involves the counterfeiting or imitation of a signature on a deed or instrument, or the fraudulent alteration of a genuine document. The essential elements are: (1) that a falsified document is made; (2) that the falsity consists in the counterfeiting of a handwriting, signature, or alteration; (3) that the document is made with intent to gain or cause damage; and (4) that the falsified document is connected to the land transaction (e.g., Deed of Absolute Sale, Extrajudicial Settlement).
III. Forgery as a Ground for Review or Reopening of Decree
A decree of registration and the certificate of title issued pursuant thereto may be reviewed or set aside if the registration was obtained through fraud. Forgery is a species of fraud that is “extrinsic” or “collateral” to the proceedings. This means the forgery prevented a party from having their day in court or presenting their claim. Under Section 32 of P.D. 1529, a petition for review of decree must be filed within one (1) year from the date of the decree’s entry, provided the petitioner is an aggrieved party and was in actual possession of the land.
IV. Action for Reconveyance Based on Implied Trust
When the one-year period for review has lapsed, an action for reconveyance is the proper remedy. A title obtained through forgery creates an implied constructive trust under Article 1456 of the Civil Code, which states that “if property is acquired through mistake or fraud, the person obtaining it is, by force of law, considered a trustee of an implied trust for the benefit of the person from whom the property comes.” The registered owner, who is not a purchaser in good faith and for value, holds the title in trust for the true owner. The prescriptive period for such an action is ten (10) years from the date of the issuance of the certificate of title, as it is based on an implied trust.
V. Nullity of the Forged Document and Its Effects
The forged deed or instrument is considered void and produces no legal effect whatsoever. It is as if it never existed. Consequently, any certificate of title derived solely from that forged document is also void. The registration of a void document does not validate it; the Torrens system cannot be used as a shield for the registration of fake documents. As held in jurisprudence, “registration does not vest title; it is merely evidence of such title. The legal title must be founded on a valid transfer from the true owner.”
VI. The Role of Good Faith and Innocent Purchasers for Value
The defense of being an “innocent purchaser for value” is crucial. If a subsequent transferee acquires the title in good faith and for valuable consideration, and registers the deed, that purchaser’s title becomes indefeasible. The burden of proving good faith rests upon the purchaser, who must show they had no knowledge of the forgery or the defect in the title at the time of purchase. The original owner’s remedy in such a case is not against the innocent purchaser, but against the person who committed the forgery or the Guarantee Fund.
VII. Distinction from Other Grounds: Fraud and Falsification
It is important to distinguish forgery from general fraud. Forgery is a specific, egregious act of falsifying a signature or document. General fraud may involve other deceitful schemes not necessarily involving falsification. Furthermore, while forgery often constitutes the crime of Falsification of Public/Private Documents under the RPC, the civil action for reconveyance or annulment of title proceeds independently of the criminal case. A finding of guilt in the criminal case is not a prerequisite for the civil action, and vice-versa.
VIII. Burden of Proof and Evidence Required
The burden of proving forgery rests on the party alleging it. The evidence required must be clear, convincing, and more than merely preponderant. Expert testimony comparing signatures, testimony of witnesses familiar with the true signature, and documentary evidence are typically necessary. The testimony of the person whose signature was allegedly forged is highly persuasive. The court will examine the evidence meticulously, as allegations of forgery strike at the heart of the reliability of registered titles.
IX. Practical Remedies

Immediate Action: Upon discovery, secure all original documents and gather evidence (e.g., specimen signatures, affidavits from witnesses).

Criminal Complaint: File a criminal complaint for Falsification of Public/Private Document under the Revised Penal Code with the Office of the Prosecutor. This establishes a public record of the forgery.

Administrative Complaint: Lodge a complaint with the Land Registration Authority (LRA) to annotate an adverse claim or to initiate an investigation on the title’s validity.

Filing an Adverse Claim: Under Section 70 of P.D. 1529, file a sworn statement of an adverse claim with the Register of Deeds to annotate the claim on the title, serving as a notice to the world and preventing further transactions. This is a provisional remedy.

Civil Action for Reconveyance: Institute a civil action for reconveyance in the proper Regional Trial Court, praying that the title be reconveyed to the true owner. Include a prayer for damages.

Action for Annulment of Title/Decree: If within one year from registration, file a petition for review of the decree of registration. If based on implied trust, file within the ten-year prescriptive period.

Claim against the Assurance Fund: If the forgery resulted in monetary loss and the innocent purchaser defense applies, explore filing a claim for compensation from the Assurance Fund under the provisions of the Property Registration Decree.

Lis Pendens: Upon filing the civil action, register a notice of lis pendens (pending litigation) with the Register of Deeds. This serves as a warning to any prospective buyer or mortgagee that the title is under litigation.