The Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act

🔍

↵

SUBJECT: The Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act

I. Introduction and Legal Basis
This memorandum addresses Republic Act No. 10911, also known as “The Anti-Age Discrimination in Employment Act,” which took effect on July 21, 2017. The law seeks to promote equality in the workplace by prohibiting arbitrary age-based employment discrimination. It is grounded in the constitutional mandate for the State to protect labor, promote full employment, and ensure equal work opportunities for all.
II. Statement of the Prohibition
The Act declares it unlawful for an employer, labor contractor, or labor organization to discriminate against any individual, whether an applicant or employee, on the basis of age. This prohibition covers all aspects of employment, including hiring, promotion, training, compensation, assignment, discipline, termination, and the granting of privileges and benefits.
III. Covered Entities and Individuals
The law applies to all employers, regardless of size, including government agencies and corporations. It also covers labor contractors, subcontractors, and labor organizations. Protection is afforded to all workers, whether employed for a definite or indefinite period, and to all job applicants.
IV. Enumeration of Unlawful Acts
The Act provides a non-exhaustive list of prohibited practices, which include:

Publishing job advertisements indicating age preferences or limitations.

Requiring age-related information from applicants (e.g., birth date, age on application forms) prior to hiring.

Declining employment solely due to the individual’s age.

Discriminating in terms of compensation, benefits, assignments, or training.

Denying promotion or imposing early retirement on the basis of age.

Terminating an employee due to age, or harassing, coercing, or intimidating an employee to retire or resign because of age.

V. Permissible Exceptions
Discrimination is not unlawful where age is a “bona fide occupational qualification” (BFOQ) reasonably necessary to the normal operation of a particular business. Examples include:

Instances where age is used to comply with safety or public health requirements.

Where the differentiation is based on valid retirement programs, seniority systems, or employee benefit plans.

Where age-related actions are taken pursuant to a court order or laws and regulations prescribing minimum ages for employment.

The burden of proving that a BFOQ exists rests upon the employer.
VI. Administrative and Judicial Recourse
An aggrieved individual may file a complaint with the Department of Labor and Employment (DOLE) through its regional offices. DOLE is empowered to conduct inspections, issue compliance orders, and impose administrative fines. The complainant may also initiate a civil action in court for damages and other affirmative relief independent of the administrative proceedings.
VII. Penalties and Liabilities
Violators are subject to an administrative fine of not less than Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php 50,000.00) but not more than Five Hundred Thousand Pesos (Php 500,000.00), at the discretion of DOLE. Each violation constitutes a separate offense. In judicial actions, employers may be liable for moral and exemplary damages, backwages, reinstatement, and attorney’s fees.
VIII. Prescriptive Period
Complaints for violations of the Act must be filed within three (3) years from the alleged act of discrimination was committed, pursuant to Article 1146 of the Civil Code.
IX. Practical Remedies
For employers, conduct an immediate audit of all employment policies, practices, and documentsfrom job advertisements and application forms to promotion criteria and retirement communicationsto eliminate age-based criteria and language. Implement mandatory training for all personnel involved in hiring and human resource management to ensure understanding of the law’s prohibitions and the narrow BFOQ exception. Establish clear, objective, and documented performance-based criteria for all employment decisions. For employees and applicants, meticulously document all incidents of potentially discriminatory statements, questions, or actions, including dates, witnesses, and copies of relevant materials (e.g., job ads, emails). File a timely complaint with the nearest DOLE Regional Office to initiate an investigation and seek administrative sanctions; concurrently, or alternatively, consult with legal counsel to assess the viability of a civil suit for damages, especially in cases of termination or denial of employment. The concurrent availability of administrative and judicial remedies allows for a strategic approach to enforcement and redress.