Monday, March 30, 2026

GR L 5162; (February, 1910)

🔎 Search our Comprehensive Legal Repository...

G.R. No. L-5162

EN BANC

G.R. No. L-5162 ; February 26, 1910

THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee,

vs.
MIKE BEECHAM, defendant-appellant.

Frederick Garfield Waite, for appellant.
Office of the Solicitor-General Harvey, for appellee.

MORELAND, J.:

The defendant in this case was charged with murder in causing the death of Edward T. Clark, the information charging said crime being as follows:

On the 11th day of May, 1908, at Camp Stotsenberg, in the municipality of Mabalacat, in the Province of Pampanga, Philippine Islands, the accused, Mike Beecham, maliciously, intentionally, and criminally, with premeditation and treachery, discharged a rifle or firearm against a soldier, Edward T. Clark, a member of the said troop of calvary, causing two wounds, one in the head and another in the abdomen, which wounds caused the death of said Clark on the 14th day of May, 1908. . . .

The defendant was convicted of murder in the court below and condemned to life imprisonment, indemnification, and costs. From this judgment and sentence the defendant appealed.

The crime above set forth was committed at the same time and with the same weapon as was committed the crime in cause No. 5161,1 just decided by this court. We make the facts and the reasons set out in that case, and used as a basis for convicting the defendant therein, a part of the decision and opinion in this case, and upon the facts and for the reasons therein set forth, we find the defendant in this case guilty of the crime of murder, qualified by treachery and attended with the aggravating circumstance of premeditation as defined by law.

The judgement of the court below is hereby reversed and it is adjudged and decreed that the defendant is guilty of the crime of murder, attended by the aggravating circumstance of premeditation, and we hereby impose upon him the penalty of death, with the accessories mentioned in article 53 of the Penal Code, the indemnification of the heirs of the said Edward T. Clark in the sum of P1,000, and the payment of the costs in this action. So ordered.

Arellano, C.J., Torres, Mapa, Johnson and Carson, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

1 Page 272, supra.

Batas Pinas

spot_img

Hot this week

GR 3257; (March, 1907)

PETRONA CAPISTRANO, ET AL. vs. ESTATE OF JOSEFA GABINO

GR 223572; (November, 2020)

JENNIFER M. ENANO-BOTE, VIRGILIO A. BOTE, JAIME M. MATIBAG, WILFREDO L. PIMENTEL, TERESITA M. ENANO, PETITIONERS, VS. JOSE CH. ALVAREZ, CENTENNIAL AIR, INC. AND SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, RESPONDENTS

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the Word in GR L 2024

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the...

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in G.R. No. 272006

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in...

The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones)

SUBJECT: The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones) I. INTRODUCTION...
⚖️ Case Intelligence
📌 Core Doctrine

"The Supreme Court affirmed that murder qualified by treachery and aggravated by premeditation warrants the imposition of the death penalty when supported by factual findings."

💡 Plain English Summary

The court found Mike Beecham guilty of murder because he killed Edward T. Clark with planning and surprise, making it more serious. Based on the same facts as another case, the court increased his punishment from life imprisonment to death due to the deliberate and treacherous nature of the crime.

📜 Legal Maxim

Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea | Dolus malus | In pari materia

Verified AI Snapshot for Armztrong.org

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img