G.R. No. 123456
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JUAN DELA CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.

Ponente: J. PERFECTO

FACTS

Juan dela Cruz was charged with the crime of Robbery with Homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on January 15, 2018, in Quezon City, the accused, armed with a knife, entered the residence of the victim, Pedro Santos, and forcibly took cash and jewelry. During the robbery, Pedro Santos resisted, and in the ensuing struggle, the accused stabbed him, causing his death.

The prosecution presented an eyewitness, Maria Santos, the victim’s wife, who testified that she saw the accused enter their house, demand money, and stab her husband when he refused to comply. The defense, on the other hand, interposed the defense of alibi, claiming that the accused was in a different city attending a family gathering at the time of the incident. The accused also denied owning the knife allegedly used in the crime.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision in toto. Hence, this appeal.

—

ISSUES

1. Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
2. Whether the defense of alibi can prevail over the positive identification by an eyewitness.
3. Whether the aggravating circumstance of dwelling was properly appreciated.

RULING

1. The prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.

The Court held that the positive identification by eyewitness Maria Santos was clear, consistent, and credible. She had a direct view of the incident and had no ill motive to falsely testify against the accused. Her testimony was corroborated by physical evidence and the medico-legal report confirming the fatal stab wound.

The defense’s alibi was weak and unsubstantiated. For alibi to prosper, the accused must prove not only that he was elsewhere when the crime was committed but also that it was physically impossible for him to be at the crime scene. The accused failed to establish physical impossibility, as the distance between the crime scene and his alleged location was not insurmountable.

2. The defense of alibi cannot prevail over positive identification.

Jurisprudence consistently holds that alibi is inherently weak and easily fabricated. It cannot prevail over the positive identification of the accused by a credible witness who had no reason to falsely accuse him. The Court found no reason to deviate from this well-established rule.

3. The aggravating circumstance of dwelling was correctly appreciated.

Robbery with Homicide is a special complex crime under Article 294 of the RPC. The aggravating circumstance of dwelling is inherent when the robbery is committed in the victim’s house, as in this case. The Court affirmed that dwelling was properly considered, as the crime was committed in the sanctity of the victim’s home, which adds to the severity of the offense.

—

DISPOSITIVE PORTION

WHEREFORE, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Regional Trial Court’s conviction of accused-appellant Juan dela Cruz for the crime of Robbery with Homicide is AFFIRMED in toto. Costs against accused-appellant.

SO ORDERED.