G.R. No. 123456
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JUAN DELA CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.

Ponente: J. PERFECTO

FACTS

Juan dela Cruz was charged with the crime of Robbery with Homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on January 15, 2018, in Quezon City, the accused, armed with a knife, entered the residence of the victim, Pedro Santos, and forcibly took cash and jewelry. During the robbery, Pedro Santos resisted, and in the ensuing struggle, the accused stabbed him, causing his death.

The prosecution presented an eyewitness, Maria Santos, the victim’s wife, who testified that she saw the accused enter their house, demand money, and stab her husband when he refused to comply. The defense, on the other hand, interposed the defense of alibi, claiming that the accused was in a different city attending a family gathering at the time of the incident.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found the accused guilty beyond reasonable doubt and sentenced him to reclusion perpetua. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision in toto. Hence, this appeal before the Supreme Court.

ISSUE

Whether the Court of Appeals erred in affirming the conviction of the accused for Robbery with Homicide despite the alleged weakness of the prosecution’s evidence and the strength of the accused’s defense of alibi.

RULING

The Supreme Court DENIED the appeal and AFFIRMED the conviction of the accused for Robbery with Homicide.

—

DOCTRINE

1. Alibi is inherently weak and cannot prevail over the positive identification of the accused by a credible eyewitness. For alibi to prosper, the accused must prove not only that he was somewhere else when the crime was committed but also that it was physically impossible for him to have been at the scene of the crime.
2. Robbery with Homicide is a composite crime where the homicide may be committed either before, during, or after the robbery. The intent to rob must be proven, and the killing must have a direct relation to the robbery.
3. Credibility of witnesses is best assessed by the trial court, and its findings are generally binding on appellate courts unless there is a clear showing of error or arbitrariness.

—

RATIO

1. Positive Identification Over Alibi. The prosecution’s eyewitness, Maria Santos, positively identified the accused as the perpetrator. Her testimony was clear, consistent, and credible. She had no motive to falsely testify against the accused. On the other hand, the defense of alibi failed to establish the physical impossibility for the accused to be at the crime scene. The distance between the alleged family gathering and the victim’s house was not so great as to preclude the accused from being present at the latter location.

2. Elements of Robbery with Homicide. All elements of the crime were proven beyond reasonable doubt:
– Taking of personal property Cash and jewelry were taken from the victim’s house.
– With intent to gain The accused’s demand for money and subsequent taking of valuables established animus lucrandi.
– With violence or intimidation The accused was armed with a knife and used force to consummate the robbery.
– Homicide was committed The victim died as a result of the stab wounds inflicted by the accused during the robbery.
– Direct relation between robbery and killing The killing occurred in the course of the robbery, as the victim resisted the unlawful taking.

3. Credibility of Witness. The RTC and CA found the testimony of Maria Santos credible. The Supreme Court gives great weight to the trial court’s assessment of witness credibility, as it had the opportunity to observe the witness’s demeanor, tone, and manner of testifying. No compelling reason was shown to overturn such findings.

4. Penalty. Robbery with Homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code is punishable by reclusion perpetua to death. In the absence of any aggravating or mitigating circumstances, the penalty of reclusion perpetua was correctly imposed by the lower courts.

—

DISPOSITIVE PORTION

WHEREFORE, the appeal is DENIED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the conviction of accused-appellant Juan dela Cruz for Robbery with Homicide and sentencing him to reclusion perpetua is AFFIRMED in toto.

Costs against accused-appellant.

SO ORDERED.