GR 3000; (September, 1906) (Digest)
G.R. No. 3000
THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ANGEL MONTES, defendant-appellant.
September 11, 1906 | Torres, J.
—
FACTS:
1. On the evening of July 19, 1904, defendant Angel Montes, a landlord, confronted his tenant, Pascual de la Cruz, over the destruction of a rice seed plot.
2. Montes beat De la Cruz with a blunt instrument and kicked him in the abdomen, causing a ruptured spleen and splenic artery, leading to fatal internal hemorrhage.
3. De la Cruz, severely injured, dragged himself home and informed his wife and uncle of the assault before dying hours later.
4. Dr. Justo Panis (provincial health board president) testified that Montes visited him the next morning, downplaying the assault as mere “reprimand” with a cane. Montes was arrested shortly after.
5. Post-mortem examination confirmed the fatal injuries were caused by Montes’ blows and kicks.
6. The trial court convicted Montes of homicide under Article 404 of the Penal Code, sentencing him to 12 years and one day of reclusiĂłn temporal, indemnification, and costs.
—
ISSUE:
Whether the trial court erred in convicting Montes of homicide and imposing the penalty, considering:
1. The nature of the act (intent to harm but not to kill);
2. The presence of extenuating circumstances (loss of self-control due to property damage); and
3. The admissibility of the deceased’s ante-mortem statement as evidence.
—
RULING:
1. Montes is guilty of homicide under Article 404 of the Penal Code.
– The fatal injuries were directly caused by his unlawful acts (beating and kicking).
– Intent to kill is not required; liability attaches to all consequences of unlawful acts (Article 1, Penal Code).
2. Extenuating circumstances apply (Articles 9[3] and 9[7], Penal Code):
– Montes acted under passion/obfuscation (due to tenant’s negligence ruining his crops).
– No aggravating circumstances offset these.
3. Penalty reduced:
– Under Rule 5, Article 81, the penalty is lowered to prisiĂłn mayor (minimum degree)6 years and 6 months.
– Accessory penalties under Article 61 apply.
– Indemnity of 1,000 pesos to the widow/heirs.
4. Ante-mortem statement admissible:
– De la Cruz’s dying declaration to his wife (corroborated by his uncle) was credible, given his imminent death and lack of motive to lie.
Disposition: The trial court’s judgment is modified. Montes is sentenced to 6 years and 6 months of prisión mayor, with accessory penalties, indemnity, and costs.
Arellano, C.J., Mapa, Carson, Willard, and Tracey, JJ., concur.
—
Key Doctrine: A person who commits an unlawful act (e.g., assault) is liable for all consequences, including death, even without intent to kill. Dying declarations are admissible if made under imminent fear of death. Extenuating circumstances (e.g., obfuscation) may mitigate penalties.
(Note: This digest follows the standard FACTS-ISSUE-RULING format for Philippine Supreme Court case summaries.)