GR 2433; (September, 1906) (Digest)
G.R. No. 2433
THE UNITED STATES, complainant-appellee, vs. DEOGRACIAS BUENAVENTURA, defendant-appellant.
September 15, 1906
—
FACTS:
1. Defendant-Appellant: Deogracias Buenaventura, a Constabulary officer, arrested Esteban Sergio without a warrant for alleged violation of the Anti-Brigandage Act.
2. Detention and Release: Sergio was detained for four days. Upon release, he paid Buenaventura 150 pesos and delivered cacao.
3. Prosecution: Buenaventura was charged with bribery under the Penal Code. The trial court convicted him and sentenced him to 2 years, 11 months, and 10 days imprisonment plus a 540-peso fine.
4. Defense Claim: Buenaventura argued the payment was a voluntary gift (post-release) under Article 386 of the Penal Code, not a bribe.
5. Evidence:
– Sergio’s wife testified the payment was a gift.
– Sergio admitted promising 200 pesos before release and signing a receipt, which Buenaventura destroyed upon partial payment.
—
ISSUE:
Whether Buenaventura committed bribery under Article 383 of the Penal Code by accepting payment in exchange for Sergio’s release.
—
RULING:
1. Conviction Modified: The Supreme Court found Buenaventura guilty under Article 383 (bribery by a public officer), not Article 381 as initially ruled.
2. Sentence:
– 4 months and 20 days (arresto mayor).
– Temporary special disqualification (8 years and 1 day).
– 540-peso fine with subsidiary imprisonment for insolvency.
3. Rationale:
– The payment was not a gift but a quid pro quo for Sergio’s release, constituting bribery.
– Act No. 175 (extortion) was inapplicable due to lack of proof of extortionate intent during arrest.
4. Precedent Cited:
– United States v. Horca (G.R. No. 2676, March 31, 1906).
– United States v. Valdehueza (3 OG 413).
Disposition: Judgment reversed; conviction under Article 383 affirmed with modified penalties. Costs imposed on appellant.
Concurring: Torres, Johnson, Tracey, JJ.
Dissenting/Disqualified: Carson, J.
—
Note: The case clarifies the distinction between bribery (Article 383) and gifts to public officers (Article 386), emphasizing the corrupt intent in official acts.