Thursday, March 26, 2026

GR 1660; (March, 1904)

🔎 Search our Comprehensive Legal Repository…

G.R. No. 1660

G.R. No. 1660 : March 28, 1904

THE UNITED STATES, complainant-appellee,

vs.
GREGORIA HERRERA, ET AL., defendants-appellants.

Thos. L. Hartigan for appellants.
Office of the Solicitor-General Araneta for appellee.

WILLARD, J.:

The defendants were convicted in the court below of the crime of detencion ilegal, committed on the person of a girl 17 years old named Marcelina Aralar.

There is no doubt that the girl frequently went out of the house in question, No. 49 Calle Arranque, Manila, both in company of the defendant Gregoria and alone, between July 7 and 18, the period of her alleged detention. She was not, therefore, during that time deprived of her liberty within the meaning of article 481 of the Penal Code.

This case can not be distinguished from cases heretofore decided by this court. (United States vs. Quevengco, No. 1208, August 6, 1903; 1 United States vs. Chu Cheng, No. 1112, April 2, 1903. 2)

The judgment is reversed and the defendants acquitted, with costs of both instances de oficio, and without prejudice to the presentation of a complaint against the defendant Gregoria for corruption of minors and a complaint against the defendant Arsenio for estupro.

Arellano, C. J., Torres, Cooper, Mapa, McDonough and Johnson, JJ., concur.

Footnotes

1 2 Phil. Rep., 412.

2 Not published.

Batas Pinas

Hot this week

GR 223572; (November, 2020)

JENNIFER M. ENANO-BOTE, VIRGILIO A. BOTE, JAIME M. MATIBAG, WILFREDO L. PIMENTEL, TERESITA M. ENANO, PETITIONERS, VS. JOSE CH. ALVAREZ, CENTENNIAL AIR, INC. AND SUBIC BAY METROPOLITAN AUTHORITY, RESPONDENTS

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the Word in GR L 2024

The Lien and the Legacy: Fidelity to the...

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in G.R. No. 272006

The Prophetic Mandate and the Weight of Judgment in...

GR 208788; (July, 2024) (Digest)

G.R. No. 208788, July 23, 2024Quezon City Government represented...

The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones)

SUBJECT: The Rule on Collision (The Three Zones) I. INTRODUCTION...
⚖️ Armztrong AI Snapshot
📌 Core Doctrine

"Illegal detention under Article 481 of the Penal Code requires actual deprivation of liberty, which is not established if the alleged victim could freely leave the premises during the period in question."

💡 Plain English Summary

The court found that the girl could come and go freely from the house, so she wasn't really being held against her will. Even though the defendants might have committed other crimes, they couldn't be convicted for illegal detention because the girl wasn't actually locked up or prevented from leaving.

📜 Latin Maxims

Actus non facit reum nisi mens sit rea | De minimis non curat lex

spot_img

Popular Categories

spot_imgspot_img