G.R. No. L-6874, March 8, 1912THE UNITED STATES vs. CAYETANO RAMAYRAT FACTS The provincial fiscal filed a complaint against Cayetano Ramayrat for the crime of gross […]
G.R. No. L-6891, March 8, 1912THE MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, plaintiff-appellant, vs. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL, ET AL., defendants; MAURO PRIETO, appellant. FACTS The Manila Railroad Company filed a […]
G.R. No. L-6859, March 30, 1912THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. NICOLAS MATINONG, ET AL., defendants. NICOLAS MATINONG, appellant. FACTS An amended information charged Nicolas Matinong and […]
G.R. No. L-6651, March 28, 1912PAULINO JACINTO (in representation of his wife Benita Reymundo), plaintiff-appellant, vs. JULIANA SALVADOR, ET AL., defendants-appellees. FACTS Paulino Jacinto instituted an […]
G.R. No. L-6665, March 30, 1912CLEMENTE MANOTOC, plaintiff-appellant, vs. FLORA CHOCO Y REYES, ET AL., defendants-appellants. FACTS On January 31, 1906, Flora Choco and her sister […]
G.R. No. L-6694, March 26, 1912MARIANO NARCIDA, et al. vs. BURTON E. BOWEN, Chief of Police FACTS Petitioners Mariano Narcida, Rafael Santos, Norberto Penisin, and Calixto […]
G.R. No. L-6690, March 29, 1912SILVESTRA TENORIO Y VILLAMIL, plaintiff-appellee, vs. THE MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, defendant-appellant. FACTS Silvestra Tenorio filed an action for damages against The […]
G.R. No. L-6748, March 16, 1912THE UNITED STATES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. AMBROSIO FIGUEROA, defendant-appellant. FACTS Ambrosio Figueroa, the president of the municipal board of health of Pililla, […]
G.R. No. L-6664, March 29, 1912PEDRO GERALDO, plaintiff-appellee, vs. MATEO ARPON, defendant-appellant. FACTS Pedro Geraldo filed an action to recover ownership and possession of a parcel […]
Counsel AI is online. Analysis is strictly governed by the 1987 Constitution and Philippine Statutes.
Counsel AI is Thinking...
IMPORTANT: This tool provides preliminary legal information under PH Law. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice from a licensed attorney.