G.R. No. 41613; September 6, 1934LAO HIAN, petitioner-appellant, vs. THE INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, respondent-appellee. FACTS Lao Hian, a Chinese woman, was arrested pursuant to an […]
G.R. No. L-1717; April 17, 1950JUANA MANLINCON and JACINTO DE GUZMAN, plaintiffs-appellees, vs. MAGNO DE VERA and CONSTANCIA URMAZA, defendants-appellants. FACTS The land in question, a […]
G.R. No. 41471; September 15, 1934PANGASINAN TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, petitioner-appellant, vs. MANILA RAILROAD COMPANY, respondent-appellee. FACTS The Manila Railroad Company (MRR) operates the Benguet Auto Line from […]
G.R. No. L-3541; May 31, 1950TOMAS T. FABELLA, petitioner, vs. TIBURCIO TANCINCO ETC., ET AL., respondents. FACTS Petitioner Tomas T. Fabella was the defendant in Civil […]
G.R. No. 41391; September 6, 1934TAN PING CO and TAN KIM, petitioner-appellants, vs. THE INSULAR COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, respondent-appellee. FACTS Tan Ping Co and Tan Kim […]
G.R. No. 41422; September 29, 1934Go Eng Chew, on behalf of Go Chian, petitioner-appellant, vs. The Insular Collector of Customs, respondent-appellee. FACTS Go Eng Chew, a […]
G.R. No. L-1698; April 8, 1950MARIANO GRANADOS, petitioner, vs. CELEDONIO MONTON, respondent. FACTS Mariano Granados purchased Lot No. 1956 from Angela Trias in June 1943, paying […]
G.R. No. 41206; September 8, 1934PHILIPPINE SUGAR ESTATE DEVELOPMENT CO., LTD., INC., plaintiff-appellee, vs. JUAN POSADAS, JR., Collector of Internal Revenue, defendant-appellant. FACTS The plaintiff, Philippine […]
Counsel AI is online. Analysis is strictly governed by the 1987 Constitution and Philippine Statutes.
Counsel AI is Thinking...
IMPORTANT: This tool provides preliminary legal information under PH Law. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice from a licensed attorney.