Blog

GR 22102; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe decision in Testate Estate of Jose Flores correctly prioritizes the determination of assets before any sale by an administrator, […]

GR 22015; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s decision in Marshall-Wells Co. v. Henry W. Elser & Co., Inc. correctly rejects a rigid, literal interpretation of […]

GR 22041; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on the principle of separation of powers to deny jurisdiction is doctrinally sound but arguably applied too […]

GR 22073; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly identifies the plaintiff as the real party in interest based on its legal title derived from the […]

GR 22063; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on res judicata and the accessory civil liability doctrine is fundamentally sound but applies a rigid, formalistic […]

GR 22082; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly affirmed the trial court’s finding that the transfer of trucks was a simulated transaction, as the evidence—particularly […]

GR 22080; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe majority’s reliance on Vegetable Oil Corporation vs. Trinidad is analytically sound in its textualist application of section 1459, correctly […]

GR 21995; (September, 1924) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly applied the doctrine of capitalization of interest in rejecting the usury defense. The appellants’ argument that the […]