Blog

GR 18999; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly rejected the application of Article 342 of the Code of Commerce, which imposes a thirty-day claim period […]

GR 18932; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on Andres vs. Pimentel and Loyola vs. Bartolome to justify registration of a significantly larger area (57+ […]

GR 18974; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe prosecution’s reliance on circumstantial evidence to prove the corpus delicti and the specific intent for theft is fundamentally sound, […]

GR 18817; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reversal rests on a fundamental violation of due process, specifically the denial of the defendant’s statutory and constitutional […]

GR 19808; (December, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly identifies the core issue as whether the Insular Treasurer abused his discretion under the Blue Sky Law […]

GR 18706; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Supreme Court correctly reversed the trial court’s erroneous application of the pactum commissorium prohibition, which voids automatic forfeiture clauses […]

GR 18289; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s factual reconstruction, while acknowledging witness exaggeration, demonstrates a problematic application of reasonable doubt. By crafting a “middle ground” […]

GR 18032; (November, 1922) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly applied ganancial property principles to item (c), holding that community funds used to redeem the wife’s separate […]