Blog

GR L 11624; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly distinguishes between personal liability and partnership liability under the Civil Code, but its application of mancomunadamente […]

GR L 11328; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s application of mutual obligations under Article 1100 of the Civil Code is analytically sound but procedurally rigid. […]

GR L 11102; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in H. C. Best v. Lizarraga Hermanos correctly identifies the central issue as whether the plaintiff […]

GR L 13156; (February, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on the trial judge’s credibility determinations is procedurally sound, given the appellate court’s limited role in […]

GR L 12971; (February, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly identifies the pivotal legislative change that governs the procedural posture of the appeal. The petitioner’s motion […]

GR L 11354; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on the agreed statement of facts to establish the guaranty contract’s validity is procedurally sound but […]

GR L 11362; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on acquiescence and the parties’ course of dealing to resolve the contractual ambiguity is legally sound […]

GR L 11109; (January, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in Matute v. Cheong Boo correctly identifies the plaintiff’s right to elect specific performance under the […]