Blog

GR L 8931; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s analysis of the admissibility of the defendant’s extrajudicial statements and offers to compromise is fundamentally sound, correctly […]

GR L 8781; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s affirmation of the demurrer correctly prioritizes the defendant’s constitutional right to be informed of the nature and […]

GR L 8748; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on the principle that a taxpayer’s deliberate failure to declare property renders him delinquent for back […]

GR L 8866; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly identified the threshold jurisdictional issue but applied Tindal v. Wesley too broadly. The decision hinges on […]

GR L 8785; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly applied the foundational principle that surety contracts are strictly construed against the creditor, as codified in […]

GR L 8699; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly rejected the plea of res judicata, as the prior action concerning the execution’s validity did not […]

GR L 8851; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on Merguire v. O’Donnell to expansively interpret “irregularity in the proceedings concerning the sale” under Section […]

GR L 8913; (March, 1914) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly applied the principle of standing to reject the appellants’ challenge under Article 1458 of the Civil […]