Blog

GR L 11528; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in Velasco v. Poizat correctly identifies a stock subscription as a binding contract with an implied […]

GR L 11595; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on the procedural regularity of the prior justice of the peace proceedings is a defensible application […]

GR L 11900; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s decision to sustain the demurrer and dismiss the action was procedurally sound but substantively deficient in its […]

GR L 11390; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s analysis in El Banco Español-Filipino v. Palanca correctly identifies the foreclosure action as a proceeding quasi in […]

GR L 10812; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reasoning in Henson v. Director of Lands is analytically sound but rests on a formalistic distinction that […]

GR L 11346; (March, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly applied the parol evidence rule exception for subsequent oral modifications, affirming that parties may alter a […]

GR L 13862; (April, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on its inherent power to stay execution pending certiorari is sound, grounded in the necessity to […]

GR L 13312; (April, 1918) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on the uncorroborated testimony of accomplices, while permissible under the precedent of The United States vs. […]