Blog

GR L 3409; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on res ipsa loquitur-style inference to establish a brigandage conspiracy under Act No. 1121 is analytically […]

GR L 3543; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly distinguishes between the procedural requirements for the grant of public lands and the subsequent perfection of […]

GR L 3520; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on the formal validity of the promissory notes and the mortgage instrument under Articles 1225 and […]

GR L 3438; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in G.R. No. L-3438 correctly identifies the plaintiff’s action as one of ownership over an assigned […]

GR L 3224; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s analysis in Muñoz & Co. v. Struckmann & Co. and Biesolt and Locke correctly centers on the […]

GR L 3515; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe trial court’s flawed application of the self-defense doctrine under Article 8(4) of the Penal Code constitutes a reversible […]

GR L 3532; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly affirmed the trial court’s judgment, as the evidence supported the finding that defendant Mendoza was the […]

GR L 3181; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s construction of article 448 is analytically sound but procedurally rigid. By interpreting the list of persons with […]

GR L 2827; (October, 1907) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s application of the burden of proof doctrine is analytically sound but procedurally questionable. By invoking semper necessitas […]