Blog

GR L 2880; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s application of conspiracy is fundamentally sound but its treatment of the appellant’s specific intent is analytically thin. […]

GR L 2681; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly rejects the defense of superior orders under Article 11(6) of the Revised Penal Code, as the […]

GR L 2809; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe proceedings in People v. Holgado were fundamentally flawed due to the trial court’s failure to adhere to mandatory […]

GR L 2856; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on Lo Cham v. Ocampo and its interpretation of the Secretary of Justice’s appointing authority under […]

GR L 2981; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s interpretation of Rule 59, Section 20 and its application to replevin bonds under Rule 62, Section 10 […]

GR L 2784; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe decision in People v. Narsolis correctly identifies a critical failure in the prosecution’s burden of proof, but its […]

GR L 2801; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on the victim’s testimony, despite the defense’s attack on its improbability, is legally sound under the […]

GR L 2743; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe trial court’s categorical refusal to consider the amnesty plea during the judicial proceeding constitutes a fundamental error, as […]

GR L 2665; (March, 1950) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s analysis of the appellants’ defense of duress is legally sound but procedurally shallow. The rejection of the […]