A.C. No. 10306. September 16, 2020Fatima S. Ingram, Complainant, v. Atty. Jose Q. Lorica IV, Respondent. FACTS The complainant, Fatima S. Ingram, and her spouse were […]
G.R. No. 160922 ; February 27, 2006JEANY-VI G. KIANI, Petitioner, vs. THE BUREAU OF IMMIGRATION AND DEPORTATION (BID); EDGARDO CABRERA, ELISEO EXCONDE and JOSE VALE, JR., […]
A.C. No. 4758 April 30, 1999Victor Nunga vs. Atty. Venancio Viray FACTS Complainant Victor Nunga, president of Masantol Rural Bank, sought the disbarment of respondent Atty. […]
A.M. No. P-09-2625; October 9, 2009ELISA C. RUSTE, Complainant, vs. CRISTINA Q. SELMA, Respondent. FACTS The complainant, Elisa C. Ruste, was the private complainant in a […]
G.R. No. 151942; November 27, 2003Spouses GREGORIO GO and JUANA TAN GO, petitioners, vs. JOHNSON Y. TONG; COURT OF APPEALS; and Honorable Judge JUAN NABONG of […]
OCA IPI No. 20-3093-MTJ, October 14, 2020Presiding Judge Marigel S. Dagani-Hugo, Regional Trial Court, Branch 3, Butuan City, Agusan del Norte, Complainant, vs. Judge Dennis B. […]
G.R. No. 160652; February 13, 2006HON. TOMAS N. JOSON III, in his capacity as Governor of the Province of Nueva Ecija, and The SANGGUNIANG PANLALAWIGAN OF […]
A.M. No. P-09-2670; October 16, 2009Office of the Administrative Services – Office of the Court Administrator, Complainant, vs. Rodrigo C. Calacal, Utility Worker I, MCTC, Alfonso […]
G.R. No. 99869 May 26, 1999THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, plaintiff-appellee, vs. ROMEO BELARO, defendant-appellant. FACTS The prosecution’s case rested primarily on the eyewitness account of […]
Counsel AI is online. Analysis is strictly governed by the 1987 Constitution and Philippine Statutes.
Counsel AI is Thinking...
IMPORTANT: This tool provides preliminary legal information under PH Law. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice from a licensed attorney.