Blog

GR L 14749; (March, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s application of prescription to bar the action for partition is fundamentally flawed, as it misapprehends the nature […]

GR L 14957; (March, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on the negative statute doctrine to find an implied repeal of prior divorce law is analytically […]

GR L 14630; (March, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s analysis in Ocejo, Perez & Co. v. Flores correctly centers on the parol evidence rule and the […]

GR L 16453; (July, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s reliance on Section 501 of the Code of Civil Procedure to impose a duty of due diligence […]

GR L 16327; (July, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly denies the motion to amend the final mandate, as such an amendment would improperly alter a […]

GR L 13012; (March, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s application of Article 1154 of the Civil Code to mitigate a contractual penalty is a significant, yet […]

GR L 14242; (September, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court correctly sustained the demurrer, as the complaint failed to allege any co-ownership between Gatmaitan and the plaintiffs, […]

GR L 16363; (August, 1920) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s analysis correctly identifies the jurisdictional boundaries of probate courts but falters in its application to the procedural […]