G.R. No. 168910; August 24, 2009REPUBLIC CEMENT CORPORATION, Petitioner, vs. PETER I. GUINMAPANG, Respondent. FACTS Respondent Peter Guinmapang was retrenched by petitioner Republic Cement Corporation in […]
G.R. No. 165697 & G.R. No. 166481; August 4, 2009ANTONIO NAVARRO and CLARITA P. NAVARRO, Petitioners, vs. METROPOLITAN BANK & TRUST COMPANY, Respondent. FACTS Petitioners Antonio […]
G.R. No. 243522, February 19, 2019Case Parties: Various Petitioners vs. The Executive Secretary, et al. FACTS The consolidated petitions assail the constitutionality of the third extension […]
G.R. No. 170604; September 2, 2013HEIRS OF MARGARITA PRODON, PETITIONERS, vs. HEIRS OF MAXIMO S. ALVAREZ AND VALENTINA CLAVE, REPRESENTED BY REV. MAXIMO ALVAREZ, JR., RESPONDENTS. […]
G.R. No. 163505; August 14, 2009GUALBERTO AGUANZA, Petitioner, vs. ASIAN TERMINAL, INC., KEITH JAMES, RICHARD BARCLAY, and ATTY. RODOLFO CORVITE, Respondents. FACTS Petitioner Gualberto Aguanza was […]
G.R. No. 171206; September 23, 2013HEIRS OF THE LATE SPOUSES FLAVIANO MAGLASANG and SALUD ADAZA-MAGLASANG, et al., Petitioners, vs. MANILA BANKING CORPORATION, now substituted by FIRST […]
G.R. No. 243522, February 19, 2019Lagman, et al. v. Medialdea, et al. FACTS This case involves consolidated petitions challenging the constitutionality of the third extension of […]
G.R. No. 164324; August 14, 2009TANDUAY DISTILLERS, INC., Petitioner, vs. GINEBRA SAN MIGUEL, INC., Respondent. FACTS Tanduay Distillers, Inc. launched a new gin product named “Ginebra […]
G.R. Nos. 175277 & 175285 and G.R. No. 192073; September 11, 2013UNICAPITAL, INC., UNICAPITAL REALTY, INC., and JAIME J. MARTINEZ, Petitioners, vs. RAFAEL JOSE CONSING, JR., […]
Counsel AI is online. Analysis is strictly governed by the 1987 Constitution and Philippine Statutes.
Counsel AI is Thinking...
IMPORTANT: This tool provides preliminary legal information under PH Law. It is not a substitute for professional legal advice from a licensed attorney.