G.R. No. L-15398
December 7, 1920
In re: CARLOS S. BASA

FACTS:
Attorney Carlos S. Basa, a member of the bars of California and the Philippine Islands, was charged, convicted, and sentenced for the crime of abduction with consent under Article 446 of the Penal Code. His conviction was affirmed by the Supreme Court. Subsequently, the Attorney-General filed a motion for his disbarment based on his conviction of a crime involving moral turpitude, as provided under Section 21 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

ISSUE:
Whether the crime of abduction with consent involves moral turpitude, warranting disciplinary action against Attorney Carlos S. Basa.

RULING:
Yes. The Supreme Court held that the crime of abduction with consent inherently involves moral turpitude, as it is contrary to justice, honesty, modesty, and good morals. While disbarment is the typical consequence, the Court, considering the respondent’s youth and promising career, exercised judicial compassion. Instead of disbarment, the Court ordered that Attorney Carlos S. Basa be suspended from the practice of law for one year, commencing from the date of his discharge from prison.