G.R. No. 123456
PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. JUAN DELA CRUZ, Accused-Appellant.

Ponente: J. Reyes

FACTS

Accused-appellant Juan Dela Cruz was charged with the crime of Robbery with Homicide under Article 294 of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged that on January 15, 2018, Dela Cruz, armed with a knife, entered the residence of the victim, Pedro Santos, with intent to rob. During the robbery, a struggle ensued, and Dela Cruz fatally stabbed Santos. The prosecution presented an eyewitness, Maria Reyes, a neighbor who claimed to have seen Dela Cruz fleeing the scene.

The defense interposed the defense of alibi, claiming that Dela Cruz was in a different city attending a family gathering at the time of the incident. Several relatives testified to corroborate his presence elsewhere.

The Regional Trial Court (RTC) found Dela Cruz guilty beyond reasonable doubt, giving full credence to the eyewitness testimony and rejecting the alibi. The RTC sentenced him to reclusion perpetua and ordered him to pay civil indemnity, moral damages, and exemplary damages to the victim’s heirs. The Court of Appeals (CA) affirmed the RTC decision in toto.

Dela Cruz now appeals before the Supreme Court, arguing that the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the lower courts erred in disregarding his alibi.

—

ISSUES
1. Whether the prosecution proved the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt.
2. Whether the defense of alibi should be given credence in light of the positive identification by an eyewitness.

RULING

1. On the proof of guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The Supreme Court AFFIRMED the conviction. The Court held that the prosecution successfully established all the elements of Robbery with Homicide:

– Taking of personal property belonging to another The victim’s wallet and cash were missing.
– With intent to gain (animus lucrandi) The unlawful taking was evident.
– With violence or intimidation against persons The accused was armed with a knife.
– Homicide was committed as a consequence or on the occasion of the robbery The killing occurred during the struggle to consummate the robbery.

The positive identification by eyewitness Maria Reyes, who had no ill motive to testify falsely, prevailed over the denial and alibi of the accused. Her testimony was clear, consistent, and credible on material points.

2. On the defense of alibi.

The Court REJECTED the defense of alibi. Jurisprudence consistently holds that alibi is inherently weak and cannot prevail over the positive identification of the accused by a credible witness. For alibi to prosper, the accused must prove not only that he was elsewhere when the crime was committed but also that it was physically impossible for him to have been at the crime scene. Dela Cruz failed to establish physical impossibility, as the distance between the crime scene and his alleged location was not insurmountable within the timeframe.

—

DOCTRINE

– Positive identification by a credible witness prevails over alibi and denial. Alibi is inherently weak and must demonstrate the physical impossibility of the accused’s presence at the crime scene.
– In Robbery with Homicide, the prosecution must prove: (a) the taking of personal property with intent to gain; (b) with violence or intimidation against persons; and (c) on the occasion or by reason of the robbery, homicide was committed.

—

DISPOSITIVE PORTION

WHEREFORE, the appeal is DISMISSED. The Decision of the Court of Appeals affirming the Regional Trial Court’s conviction of accused-appellant Juan Dela Cruz for Robbery with Homicide is AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION. Accused-appellant is sentenced to reclusion perpetua without eligibility for parole and ordered to pay the heirs of Pedro Santos the following amounts:

– Civil indemnity: ₱100,000.00
– Moral damages: ₱100,000.00
– Exemplary damages: ₱100,000.00
– Actual damages: ₱50,000.00 (as proven by receipts)
– Interest at 6% per annum on all damages from finality of judgment until fully paid.

SO ORDERED.