March 31, 2026

GR L 3603; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on Garcia de Lara vs. Gonzalez de Lara is procedurally sound but substantively questionable given the […]

GR L 3595; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly affirmed the jurisdiction of the Court of First Instance, as the action was filed beyond the […]

GR L 3592; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly applied the procedural rule from Tarrosa v. Pearson, holding that a new complaint on appeal to […]

GR L 3538; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe trial court’s factual finding that the defendant’s involvement in sales was unproven is a clear error under the […]

GR L 3502; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in Enriquez v. Victoria correctly anchors its analysis in the procedural law in force at the […]

GR L 3481; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court correctly distinguishes between an action for partition and an action for recovery of a specific distributive share. […]

GR L 3533; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reliance on ratification under Article 1511 of the Civil Code is analytically sound but procedurally shallow. By […]

GR L 3355; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe court’s reasoning in Mendoza v. Nabong rests on a strict application of burden of proof principles in property […]

GR L 3282; (January, 1908) (CRITIQUE)__________________________________________________________________THE AI-ASSISTED CRITIQUEThe Court’s analysis in Aguado v. City of Manila correctly identifies the successor liability of the defendant municipality for […]